Fourteen associates. One round table.
A virtual associate roster — a senior partner, a loremaster, a drafter, a junior, a paralegal, and three devils' advocates with different attack angles. Assign tasks one-on-one, or convene the round table and let several agents deliberate together. Dissent is preserved by name; the chair synthesises at the end.
Fourteen specialists. Fourteen voices.
Each agent is a distinct AI persona — a tuned system prompt, a best-fit model, a defined role at the table. The Chair leads. Three devils' advocates attack from documents, doctrine, and closing. Senior counsel and the brief-bearer carry the high-stakes appearances. Research, drafting, and paralegal sit alongside. Three lenses — first-principles, expansionist, and outsider — keep the firm honest when it has been deep in a file too long.
Chairs the round-table. Strategy, second opinions, go/no-go calls on whether to file.
Senior advocate. Reserved for the highest matters — Supreme Court appeals, Constitution Bench, final arbitral submissions.
The brief-runner. Compendium, list of dates, anticipated questions — everything the senior needs at the lectern.
Pulls holdings, not just case names. Long-context sweeps of the reporters.
Tight legal prose. Refuses to claim more than the record supports.
Quick, organised, no flourish. Hearing prep and checklists.
Twelve years in registries. Chronologies, exhibit indices, document lists.
The firm's standing pessimist. Sees every way a plan can fail — useful precisely because nothing reassures him.
Takes the lawyer's question apart at the joints. Asks whether the question itself is the right one before answering.
Finds the procedural lever the senior partner missed — settlement paths, counter-claims, unexplored reliefs.
Reads the dispute as a stranger would, with the firm's accumulated framing stripped away. Not on anyone's side — sees what's actually there.
Finds the contradiction buried in your file. Reads what the other side will read.
Attacks the statutes and authorities your brief stands on. If the foundation cracks, he says so.
Drafts the closing submission that would beat you. Then tells you how to answer it.
The work product of a junior chambers.
Not a chatbot. The agents return the same kind of deliverables a junior associate would walk into the partner's room with — drafts, chronologies, research notes, adversarial reviews.
A senior view on the file.
the Chair reads the case record and tells you, blunt and brief, whether the file is ready to set down. Strategic risks named, not surveyed. A recommended move at the end of every brief.
Authority you can cite.
the Loremaster returns holdings, not case names. Proper citations — (Year) Vol SCC Page. Where the law cuts against your position, that's surfaced too. A 'Records relied on' footer on every brief.
Pleadings ready to file.
the Drafter drafts numbered paragraphs, Indian court English, no rhetorical overreach. Every factual assertion traceable to the record. Refuses to draft what the record doesn't support.
Chronologies, indices, checklists.
the First-Year prepares hearing-day checklists and list-of-dates. the Registrar builds exhibit indices and tabular chronologies with P-1 / D-1 conventions. Mechanical precision, no commentary.
Three devils' advocates.
the Documents Devil attacks your paper. the Doctrine Devil attacks your law. the Closing Devil writes the opposing closing. Three different angles of attack, three different artefacts. The bench will find what they find before the bench does.
The chair's recommendation.
When the round table is done, the Chair produces a structured synthesis — agreements, dissents preserved by name, the chair's own recommendation, action items per agent. The lawyer reads one document, not eight.
When you want them to argue.
A round table is a multi-agent deliberative session. Pick a panel from the roster — any two, any eight — pose an opening, and the agents discuss in turns. Each one sees the full transcript before they speak, and is explicitly required to disagree by name where they disagree.
Drive the conversation manually if you want — “the Doctrine Devil, your view?” — or hit auto-run and let the panel rotate for two or three rounds while you read other files. When you're done, ask the chair to synthesise. You get one document back: agreements, dissents preserved by name, a chair's recommendation, action items per agent.
- ·Dissent is not papered over — it's the point of the exercise.
- ·Each agent speaks in their own model (Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, Gemini Flash).
- ·The lawyer can interject at any turn; agents see it before they speak again.
- ·Reopen a synthesised table at any time and run another round.
- 01Pick the panel.Any subset of the fourteen agents. Default starting line-up: the Chair + the three devils' advocates.
- 02Pose the opening.A scenario, a question, a passage from the record. The panel sees this before they speak.
- 03Drive — or auto-run.Per-agent buttons let you call on a specific voice. Auto-run rotates the panel for one to three rounds in the background.
- 04Dissent surfaces.Every agent's turn is required to disagree by name where they disagree. The transcript preserves it.
- 05The chair synthesises.the Chair reads the full transcript and produces agreements, dissents preserved by name, a recommendation, and per-agent action items.
No false consensus.
Most multi-agent systems converge — they soften their views to agree with each other. The Round Table is built the other way: agents are required to surface disagreement by name. The synthesis records who dissented on what, and why.
Re-anchor the principal claim as breach of agency duties, not generic fiduciary breach. Hold the fiduciary claim in reserve as an alternative plea.
- ✓The 2023 Constitution Bench narrowed the standard.
- ✓Contemporaneous documents are thin on record.
Built for privileged work.
Your matters stay yours.
Every case sits in an isolated record. Agents only see the case they're assigned to. Conflict-clearance precedes every engagement.
Every model call is logged.
Each turn, each task, each synthesis records the model, the documents sent, and the token usage. Discovery-ready.
Your record is not training data.
API calls only. Anthropic and Google's enterprise terms prohibit training on customer prompts and responses.
Fourteen associates are waiting.
Free to try. Upload a case, assign a task, convene a round table. First synthesis takes about a minute.